On what basis should an inspector decide to use embargo, seizure, or condemnation?

The correct choice focuses on statutory authority and the immediacy of risk as the primary basis for an inspector's decision to use embargo, seizure, or condemnation. Inspectors operate within the legal framework established by health regulations and laws, which delineate their authority to take action in response to public health risks.

Statutory authority provides the legal grounds for an inspector to initiate actions such as embargoing or seizing products that may pose a direct threat to public health and safety, such as contaminated food items or unsafe products. This authority ensures that the actions taken are within the scope of the law and aim to protect the community.

Immediacy of risk refers to the urgency with which an action must be taken to prevent harm. If there is clear, imminent danger to public health—such as an outbreak of foodborne illness linked to a specific product—an inspector must act swiftly. This consideration is crucial as it prioritizes the health and safety of the population over other factors.

In contrast, factors like the political power of the owner, the inspector's personal preferences, or cost considerations do not directly pertain to the legal and health imperatives guiding public health inspections. These elements might introduce bias or subjectivity into the decision-making process, which should