Which of the following is considered a disadvantage of the shredded solid waste landfill method?

The rationale behind selecting the response that states "it will readily absorb precipitation" as the disadvantage of shredded solid waste landfill methods is based on the implications of moisture retention in landfills. When solid waste is shredded, it significantly increases the surface area of the waste material. This increased surface area can lead to a greater capacity for the waste to retain water and absorb precipitation, which can become problematic.

Shredded waste can suppress the formation of an effective leachate barrier, leading to increased leachate production. Leachate is a liquid that forms when waste breaks down and water filters through that waste. An excess of leachate can create challenges in managing the potential for groundwater contamination and can contribute to more significant environmental issues, including the ability for pollutants to migrate into surrounding areas.

Moreover, the need for effective leachate management systems becomes more critical in shredded waste landfills. As moisture is retained, it can lead to anaerobic decomposition processes within the landfill, which can produce harmful gases like methane, thus posing additional environmental and health risks.

Overall, while shredding waste can help with compaction and potentially reduce some issues like insect breeding and odors, the property of readily absorbing precipitation points to significant disadvantages in terms of landfill management and environmental protection