Which of the following is not a recognized way to address an asbestos hazard?

The approach identified as not being a recognized way to address an asbestos hazard is demolition. While demolition can indeed remove buildings or structures that contain asbestos, it is not typically considered a recognized or acceptable method for addressing the hazard itself.

When addressing asbestos in a manner that minimizes health risks to workers and the public, the primary focus is on managing the material safely. The accepted methods for dealing with asbestos include removal, enclosure, and encapsulation.

Removal involves the complete extraction of asbestos-containing materials from a building or structure, which is often the preferred method when safe and feasible. Enclosure, on the other hand, involves sealing off asbestos materials to prevent the release of fibers into the air, thereby mitigating the health risks without removing the hazardous materials. Encapsulation refers to the application of a sealant to asbestos-containing materials to bind the fibers together or coat the surface, further preventing fiber release.

Demolition, while it may eliminate the physical presence of asbestos, does not adequately address the hazard inherent to the material itself during the process. In fact, improper demolition can pose significant risks, as it may release asbestos fibers into the environment, leading to potential exposure. Therefore, this method is not recognized as a safe or appropriate means of managing asbestos hazards.